Anonymous

Evolutionary suppressors: Difference between revisions

From EvoLudo
m
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{InCharge|author1=Christoph Hauert}}__NOTOC__ Evolutionary suppressors are the counterparts of evolutionary amplifiers. For the spatial Moran process these populatio...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
The simplest and most extreme case of an evolutionary suppressor is given by a linear chain where the offspring of each individual consistently replaces e.g. the occupant of the vertex to its right. Thus, the leftmost vertex is a root and is never replaced whereas the offspring of the rightmost, tail vertex is lost. This generates a flux through the population from left to right such that no mutant can reach fixation unless the mutation occurs in the root vertex. This happens with the probability \(1/N\) in a chain of length \(N\) but then fixation occurs with certainty. Consequently, the fixation is simply
The simplest and most extreme case of an evolutionary suppressor is given by a linear chain where the offspring of each individual consistently replaces e.g. the occupant of the vertex to its right. Thus, the leftmost vertex is a root and is never replaced whereas the offspring of the rightmost, tail vertex is lost. This generates a flux through the population from left to right such that no mutant can reach fixation unless the mutation occurs in the root vertex. This happens with the probability \(1/N\) in a chain of length \(N\) but then fixation occurs with certainty. Consequently, the fixation is simply
\begin{align}
\begin{align}
\rho = \frac1N,
\rho_0 = \frac1N,
\end{align}
\end{align}
irrespective of the mutant’s fitness. Selection is eliminated and random drift rules. If a graph contains multiple root nodes then a single mutation can never reach fixation, \(\rho=0\).
irrespective of the mutant’s fitness. Selection is eliminated and random drift rules. If a graph contains multiple root nodes then a single mutation can never reach fixation, \(\rho=0\).
860

edits