Tutorials: Difference between revisions

From EvoLudo
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
== [[Evolutionary graph theory]] ==
{|
| style="vertical-align:top" |[[Image:EGT - Superstar.svg|160px|left|link=Evolutionary graph theory]]
| style="vertical-align:top" |Tutorial on evolutionary graph theory, which provides a formal approach to describe the spreading and fixation (or extinction) of a mutant type in a resident population. The structure of the population is represented as a graph where nodes represent individuals and edges define the neighbourhood of each individual. Interestingly, while the fixation probabilities remain unaffected by the underlying population structure for a large class of graphs, some graphs may act either as amplifiers or suppressors of selection by increasing or decreasing the fixation probabilities as compared to unstructured populations.
<div class="footnote" style="font-size:smaller">
#Lieberman, E., Hauert, C. & Nowak, M. (2005) ''Nature'' '''433''' 312-316 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03204 doi: 10.1038/nature03204].
#Jamieson-Lane, A. & Hauert, C. (2015) ''J. Theor. Biol.'' '''382''' 44-56 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.029 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.029].
</div>
|}
{{-}}


== [[Stochastic dynamics in finite populations]] ==
== [[Stochastic dynamics in finite populations]] ==

Revision as of 13:47, 1 July 2016


Evolutionary graph theory

File:EGT - Superstar.svg
Tutorial on evolutionary graph theory, which provides a formal approach to describe the spreading and fixation (or extinction) of a mutant type in a resident population. The structure of the population is represented as a graph where nodes represent individuals and edges define the neighbourhood of each individual. Interestingly, while the fixation probabilities remain unaffected by the underlying population structure for a large class of graphs, some graphs may act either as amplifiers or suppressors of selection by increasing or decreasing the fixation probabilities as compared to unstructured populations.
  1. Lieberman, E., Hauert, C. & Nowak, M. (2005) Nature 433 312-316 doi: 10.1038/nature03204.
  2. Jamieson-Lane, A. & Hauert, C. (2015) J. Theor. Biol. 382 44-56 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.029.


Stochastic dynamics in finite populations

Tutorial on the stochastic dynamics arising through demographic noise and mutations in finite populations of size \(N\). Comparisons of the deterministic replicator dynamics in the limit of infinite population sizes \(N\to\infty\) to the stochastic dynamics generated by stochastic differential equations, which are derived from a microscopic description of elementary changes in the population, as well as to results from individual based simulations.
  1. Traulsen, A., Claussen, J. C. & Hauert, C. (2012) Phys. Rev. E 85 041901 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.041901.
  2. Traulsen, A., Claussen, J. C. & Hauert, C. (2006) Phys. Rev. E 74 011901 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011901.
  3. Traulsen, A., Claussen, J. C. & Hauert, C. (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 238701 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.238701.


Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics

Tutorial on frequency dependent selection in populations of varying size. The classic replicator dynamics assumes constant (infinite) population sizes and thus neglects the ecology of the population. Linking ecological dynamics and evolutionary games generates fascinating and rich dynamical behavior. Most importantly, however, this reveals a new mechanism for maintaining cooperation through negative feedback between population densities and the size of interaction groups.
  1. Wakano, J. Y. & Hauert, Ch. (2011) J. theor. Biol. 268 30-38 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.09.036.
  2. Wakano, J. Y., Nowak, M. A. & Hauert, Ch. (2009) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 7910-7914 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812644106.
  3. Hauert, Ch., Wakano, J. Y. & Doebeli, M. (2008) Theor. Pop. Biol. 73, 257-263 doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2007.11.007.
  4. Hauert, C., Holmes, M. & Doebeli, M. (2006) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 2565-2570 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3600.


Origin of Cooperators and Defectors

Tutorial on the gradual evolution of distinct cooperative and defective behavioral patterns through evolutionary branching into separate trait groups characterized by high and low cooperative investments. This is based on a model that extends the classical Snowdrift game to continuously varying degrees of cooperation. Apart from evolutionary branching, this model exhibits rich dynamics that can be easily explored using this interactive tutorial.
  1. Killingback, T., Doebeli, M. & Hauert, Ch. (2010) Biological Theory 5, 3-6 doi: 10.1162/BIOT_a_00019.
  2. Doebeli, M., Hauert, C. & Killingback, T. (2004) Science 306, 859-862 doi: 10.1126/science.1101456.


2×2 Games

Tutorial on 2×2 games in populations with different structures. 2×2 games describe a rich set of pairwise interactions among individuals. The most prominent game is certainly the Prisoner's Dilemma which has become the paradigm to discuss the emergence of cooperative behavior. If players are arranged on regular lattices, many of these games produce fascinating spatio-temporal patterns. This tutorial provides a hands-on experience of this dynamical world.
  1. Hauert, C. (2002) Int. J. of Bifurcation & Chaos 12 1531-1548 doi: 10.1142/S0218127402005273.
  2. Hauert, C. (2001) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 761-769 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1424.